Yes - I'm currently working on some draft notes for local extensions of
SRU/SRW (prompted by the "should we support other query languages?" to
question to which I think the answer should be "only as a private/local
extension"), and I cover this in those.
Hopefully I'll post these this weekend (if BT can fix the fault on my
phoneline at home!!)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 15 January 2003 15:00
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: 'operation' field for sru
> This is important for local extensions as well as standard ones.
> In order to debug my resultset handling, I wrote a quick
> function to dump them back in a simple XML format. When I
> went to add this to SRU, it was impossible without the
> operation field.
> ,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet:
> liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
> ____/:::::::::::::. WWW:
> I L L U M I N A T I