Could these relations be generalised
contains or hasPart or isSubsetOf
isContainedBy or isPartOf or isSupersetOf
and defined in a generic utility set?
From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Wed 15/01/2003 17:33
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CQL + GEO
> I say, go ahead. At least your experiences can prime the
pumps of the
> design process. Easier than designing in a vacuum.
I think we need two new relations, and one modifier:
encloses Data is range, term is point/range
within Data is point, term is range