LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC Archives

ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC  March 2003

ISOJAC March 2003

Subject:

Language names (WAS: [JACVOTE] AW: Preliminary results: ISO 639 JAC ballot 1-2003 - Udmurt - NEW DISCUSSION - Until 2003-03-21)

From:

Håvard Hjulstad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Wed, 5 Mar 2003 20:52:50 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (234 lines)

I also agree with statements below. I send this message also in order to
bring this discussion to the correct list: It belongs to the larger JAC
list, not to the JACVOTE list.

People have strong feelings connected to their names and the names and words
used to designate their own world. We definitely need to respect that. This
is actually a part of the English and French languages (or any language)
that users of those languages do NOT have all rights to control. We cannot
say that "this is just what it is called in English". We need to be careful
not to standardized "bad" names.

On the other hand: For retrieval of information it is important that both
"good" and "bad" names are recorded. If someone were to search for "Votiak"
in 639, we do want him/her to find "Udmurt". But the different names need to
be marked in some way, following some criteria. And we need relyable and
consistent information for the application of the markings.

All in all this is far beyond the scope and possibilities of the JAC. We
need a new and larger project to handle all this adequately, drawing on
experience and documentation in existing sources like Ethnologue and the
Linguasphere registry, and the academic linguistic community.

It feels unsatisfactory to deal with individual items and incomplete
information. However, the JAC cannot stop its work waiting for a "new and
perfect world". The JAC can draft rules relating to this, but the JAC cannot
collect all the evidence needed to apply the rules perfectly.

I suggest that we start working with these "naming rules", and that we
schedule a meeting in a not too distant future to discuss the topic.

Håvard

-------------------------
Håvard Hjulstad    mailto:[log in to unmask]
Chairman ISO/TC37 (Terminology and other language resources)
Convener of ISO/TC37/SC2/WG1 (Language coding)
Acting chairman of ISO 639 RA-JAC
  Solfallsveien 31
  NO-1430  Ås, Norway
  tel: +47 64963684  &  +47 64944233
  mob: +47 90145563
  http://www.hjulstad.com/havard/
-------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: ISO JAC Voting Member List [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of
Anila Angjeli
Sent: 5. mars 2003 18:31
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [JACVOTE] Réf. : [JACVOTE] AW: Preliminary results: ISO 639 JAC
ballot 1-2003 - Udmurt - NEW DISCUSSION - Until 2003-03-21


I agree with Christian about the necessity of a methodology inorder to avoid
the
sterile discussions about the legitimacy of the different existing forms of
language names and their status.  All the aspects revealed here below are
worth
considering. Nevertheles some of them are more likely to provoke reactions
than
others. I mean here, for example,  the criterion of the preference the
native
speakers have for one or another name of the language. We have to respect
the
native speaker's choice, but this doesn't mean that the "not preferred name
of
the language" (with exception of pejorative appelations) is not to be taken
into
account by the standard, even if these name of the langue is largely used by
other speakers. The database must enable the users to search the code by any
(?)
known form of the language.
About the eventual rules :
We may take advantage of the existing rules of the present standard ISO 639
for
the application of new language codes.
So one of the rules might be the quotation of the variant (form) name
proposed,
in a certain number of documents (number to be defined) or in different
databases or/and  internet sources.
Another might be the register, the level of the langue in which this name
has
been encounterd : scientific, linguistic studies, popular, etc.
Not to be forgotten the problems issued from the translitterated forms of
the
names, as well.

to be followed...

best regards
Anila




Christian Galinski <[log in to unmask]> le 05/03/2003 07:12:07

Veuillez répondre ā ISO JAC Voting Member List <[log in to unmask]>

Pour :    [log in to unmask]
cc :   (ccc : Anila ANGJELI/750/DIA/BnF)
Objet :   [JACVOTE] AW: Preliminary results: ISO 639 JAC ballot 1-2003 -
      Udmurt - NEW              DISCUSSION - Until 2003-03-21



Dear colleagues,
again the question of - let us call it - 'flavor' of names arises, which
means that theree is quite a range between preferred name(s) and
deprecated name(s). There may be 'also used' (or admitted, but
non-preferred), 'old' (and non-pre-ferred), 'old' (and deprecated),
'depreciatory', 'offensive', etc. all of which should be in the database
(with the respective comments). But only the preferred and admitted ones
should appear in the 'official' version of the standard (and the
respective data of the database). I think we need a simple methodology
here - not necessarily too complex, just a few rules. If we do not
register these aspects NOW, we will might have a big job in the future!
rgds
Christian

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee [mailto:[log in to unmask]]Im Auftrag
von Håvard Hjulstad
Gesendet: Dienstag, 04. März 2003 12:35
An: [log in to unmask]
Betreff: Preliminary results: ISO 639 JAC ballot 1-2003 - Udmurt - NEW
DISCUSSION - Until 2003-03-21


The message below was sent on 2003-01-29.

The question was whether Votiak/votiak should be added as alternate names
for the language in English and French. One comment was received to the
effect that the term "Votiak" (with variant "Vokyak") is "not preferred"
by
the people themselves. I consider this a very strong argument indeed, and
the statement (from Michael Everson) has not been contradicted by others.

Formally the situation is the following: All questions have been approved,
except the French name (i.e. the English name has been approved as
"Udmurt"
only). Unless I hear arguments to the contrary until 2003-03-21, I shall
send out a second ballot for the French name only, asking again for yes/no
to "oudmourte" only. However, the question is equally valid for both
English
and French, and in case I hear arguments in favour of adding "votiak" in
French, we also need to have a second ballot for the English name.

Regards,
Håvard

* * * OLD MESSAGE (2003-01-29) * * *

The first ballot on this item has been completed. The original ballot form
is included below.

The ballot passed unanimously on all points except the French name.
The inclusion of the identifier "udm" has been approved; we just need a
new
round to determine the names.

The following comment was submitted relating to the French name:
" I suggest the French name "votiak" It is the name which appears on the
most well known French source about languages : "Les langues du Monde"
published by Société linguistique de Paris in 1952. In the book, "votiak"
appears as the French form for the language for which the indigenous name
is
"ud-murt". The French name for the people speaking these langue is
"Votiaks"
, these people live between Viatka and Kama. "

It should be noted that the Ethnologue also lists "Votiak" and "Votyak" as
alternate names (in English). The French name "oudmourte" is indeed found.
A
quick search with Google for French documents finds a few more documents
containing "oudmourte" than "votiak".

My suggestion would be to include English "Udmurt; Votiak" and French
"oudmourte; votiak". Comments?

Best regards,
Håvard Hjulstad

* * * * * *

ISO 639 Ballot -- New item: Udmurt

Please vote by Friday 2003-01-24.

Please see additional information below the ballot form.

Submitted by (your name, please):

(A) -- Inclusion:
(1)
___  I am in favour of including the individual language "Udmurt" in 639-2
(alpha-3 code)
___  I am opposed to including the individual language "Udmurt" in 639-2
(alpha-3 code)

(B) -- Identifier:
(Please vote even if you are opposed to the inclusion of the item)
(2)
___  I accept the alpha-3 identifier "udm" for Mordvin (if to be included)
___  I do not accept the identifier "udm" -- Comment:

(C) -- Language names:
(3)
___  I accept the English name "Udmurt" (if to be included)
___  I do not accept the English name "Udmurt" -- Comment:

(4)
___  I accept the French name "oudmourte" (if to be included)
___  I do not accept the French name "oudmourte" -- Comment:

(5)
___  I accept the indigenous name "udmurt kyl" (if to be included)
___  I do not accept the indigenous name "udmurt kyl" -- Comment:


Other comments:

* * * * * * *

Background and additional information:

This is based on a proposal submitted on 2002-10-11 and circulated to the
JAC for comments on 2002-10-30. Feedback has been received from Michael
Everson only.

The source of the French name is http://www.eurominority.org/.

The source of the indigenous name is http://www.evertype.com/alphabets/

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
January 2021
November 2020
June 2020
May 2019
February 2019
September 2018
April 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
May 2016
April 2016
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager