LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1 Archives

PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1  March 2003

PCCTG1 March 2003

Subject:

Charge and workplan

From:

Jimmie Lundgren <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 7 Mar 2003 14:16:18 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (67 lines)

Dear SACO Task Group,
        Thanks for your input regarding the workplan and the charge. Here is
the latest version of the workplan after swapping times between the
utilities and LC parts of the contribution and distribution mechanism topics
as suggested by Hugh and supported by messages from Susan, Tom and Linda:

Revised workplan (March 7)
Week 1. (March 3-7) General views on charge and workplan (including any
amendments), and verification of email receipt.
Week 2. (March 10-14) Membership criteria.
Week 3-4. (March 17-28) Membership responsibilities and benefits.
Week 5-6. (March 31-April 11) Contributor perspective on contribution and
distribution mechanism.
Week 7. (April 14-18) LC perspective on contribution and distribution
mechanism.
Week 8. (April 21-25) Utilities' role in contribution and distribution
mechanism.
Week 9-10. (April 28-May 9) Supporting documentation.
Week 11. (May 12-16) Training support.
Week 12. (May 19-23) Feedback.
Week 13. (May 26-30) Review of discussion and plan for next steps.
Week 14. (June 2-6) Drafting preliminary report.

        I do not have any news yet on the RLG liaison to our task group. I
sent an email asking Ana Cristan about this and will let you know when she
responds. I hope someone will be assigned soon, but it seems to me that we
should go ahead with our discussions, especially since we do not plan to
take up the issue of the utilities role until late April.

        Since there have been no major issues raised or other significant
comments regarding the charge other than those from Hugh, I take this as a
sign that the charge is clear as written and not in need of clarification or
revision. Please speak up if you think otherwise. Just for good measure, I
will copy it below:


PCC Task Group on SACO Program Development
Charge:
        1) To identify institutional/participant needs to facilitate subject
proposal contributions for inclusion in LCSH.
        2) To recommend parameters for membership in SACO
        3) To propose a list of responsibilities that accompany SACO
membership, both from the PCC and the participant perspective.
It is expected that by satisfying these charges the task group will be
developing recommendations for the programmatic structure for the SACO
Program of the PCC, as directed by action item 6d of the PCC Policy
Committee meeting summary <http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/pocosum02.pdf>
November, 2002. The final report of the task force will contain
recommendations including those that:
        1) Outline a SACO training scenario, including what responsibilities
the PCC has in providing/sharing the existing subject cataloging
documentation or that which might be newly developed.
        2) Suggest a mechanism for facilitating the contribution and
distribution of subject proposals among subject trainers and training
institutions for internal review, for final review by LC editorial review
staff, and for distribution of approved headings to the community at large.
        3) Identify whose responsibility it should be to implement each of
the elements described..

        Monday we will begin our discussions on Membership criteria (part 2
of the charge). What expectations are reasonable and desirable for SACO
members? Quantity? Quality? For perspective on current and recent statistics
of SACO participants there are links to pdf tables from the webpage at
http://www.loc.gov/catdir/pcc/stats/stats.html I look forward to hearing
your thoughts on this topic. In the meantime, have a great weekend. Thanks,
Jimmie

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
December 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
June 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
July 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager