LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1 Archives

PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1  March 2003

PCCTG1 March 2003

Subject:

Re: Week 2 - Membership criteria

From:

Mary Charles Lasater <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 10 Mar 2003 07:42:59 -0600

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (65 lines)

Hugh and All,

I also took a look at the stats this weekend and I agree with most
of what Hugh has stated. I have not seen Fenly's report that you
refer to. Is it available on the Web? Did I miss something?

I work at one of the BIBCO institutions that would not make the
cut. I would like to give a big reason why. Our ability to get SACO
proposals through the existing process has been such a problem
that most of the catalogers here will not propose headings
anymore. The proposals we currently submit are mostly the work
of new catalogers that just received NACO training last Fall. (I do
the 5th day of SACO training). They haven't yet gotten
discouraged by the process. Does it affect our BIBCO
contributions? Probably, but only in a very small way.

It has been our experience that the current SACO process cannot
support lots of contributions by various libraries. There just were
not enough people in COOP Cat to get all the proposals through. It
does seem to be working a little better with the Webform but still
not as well as it should. I looked at Ozarkers which has been a
proposed heading since early December (a term I could use). It
was still proposed and not on a list that I could find as of March 9.

I agree very strongly about not needing to do as many headings
year by year. It appears to me that many of the libraries doing lots
of SACO proposals are involved in digital programs. Those can
begin and end and for those committed to SACO, they can
produce lots of numbers. In addition, if we put a 'bottom line' limit
on the headings, the pattern ones that need to be created (at LC
as well as locally) will quickly be done. I have two I could create
from one page of headings I checked recently. I would just need to
pull the pieces and do the "patterns".

I also like the idea of funnels but I think they will need to be subject
specific. I can do some "pattern" headings all day, but it seems
that only some people can do them for ethnic groups of the
Americas. There are so many "exceptions" per subject area that
doing SACO proposals outside of your normal work is comparable
to doing a corporate name heading when all you are "NACO
independent for" is personal names. We would have lots of areas of
independence. For me questions to CPSO about how to set
something up has worked most of the time. These end up being
handled by various people and I still have had proposals that got
"lost" among various teams. We may need a funnel for the easy
stuff by people that don't do SACO proposals much but we still
need a mechanism for involving the experts.

I totally agree with Hugh's statement about quality and quantity " I would
be more inclined, in theory, to trust a small specialist library dealing
with an area in which it has a high degree of knowledge over an institution
like my own, a large "general" library."

My two cents,

Mary Charles


Mary Charles Lasater
Authorities Coordinator
Vanderbilt University
21st Avenue South
Nashville, TN 37240
(615) 343-2085

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
December 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
June 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
July 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager