>>>>> "RG" == Rebecca S Guenther <[log in to unmask]> writes:
RG> In all this discussion about being able to better handle journal
RG> articles and the like this question does arise about whether we
RG> need something that specifically says "I am a component part" or
RG> whether the other data will make it obvious (particularly the
RG> relatedItem data). I think the latter is the case, particularly if
RG> we enhance the ability to give more information about the
Along these lines, would it be useful for MODS to permit relatedItem
to refer to an external MODS document?
I'm thinking of the way a METS document and include another METS
document for building up an aggregate object.
Tod A. Olson <[log in to unmask]> "How do you know I'm mad?" said Alice.
Programmer / Analyst "If you weren't mad, you wouldn't have
The University of Chicago Library come here," said the Cat.