At 05:39 PM 4/14/2003 -0700, Karen wrote:
>*************** subDocumentType ******************
><subDocumentType>
> <subDocDetail type="[type]" number="[number]" caption="[caption]"
> order="[order]" title="[title]/>
> <subDocExtent type="[type]" value="[value]" />
> <text></text>
> </subDocumentType>

A probably irrelevent aside, but I found it interesting that this set parallels
part of the METS <div> and <area> elements rather closely:

<div type="[type]" orderlabel="[orderlabel]"
         order="[order]" label="[label]">
         <fptr><area exttype="[extent type]" extent="[extent]" ... >
         </area></ftpr>
</div>

where METS 'type' is equivalent to Karen's/David's 'type,' 'orderlabel' is
equivalent to 'number,' etc. The extent handling is obviously a bit
different in METS, since it's being used as a bridging element to a separate
data file, but the general notion is the same.

The only other obvious difference to me is that METS assumes that the
information in
Karen's/David's caption element would just be placed inside the orderlabel
element in METS (so "orderlabel='p. 47'" in METS, vs "number='47'
caption='p.').
But if the intent of a change to MODS would be improving the ability to encode
citations, I'm betting someone somewhere would want the caption kept separate
from the number for formatting purposes, so K/D's approach is preferable
to METS' for that purpose.

Jerome McDonough
Digital Library Development Team Leader
Elmer Bobst Library, New York University
70 Washington Square South, 8th Floor
New York, NY 10012
[log in to unmask]
(212) 998-2425