> Right now, my SRU server strips off the SOAP wrapper from the
> searchRetrieveResponse and removes any xsi:type="whatever" strings. I have
> added logic to also replace any <, > and " strings with the
> appropriate value. Suddenly, SRU is returning the records as subfields of
> the recordData field.
> I think that is our solution. Forget about the recordPacking and recordXML
> fields. Return string-encoded records in SRW and non-string-encoded records
> in SRU.
Not that I mind, because this is almost how my own code handles it, but
this makes SRU not describable by WSDL?
Also, it'd be nice to be able to optionally do the same thing in SRW, if
it is possible to describe in WSDL. (Surely it can be, as it just needs to
point at an <any/> type in a schema as we already do document encoding?)
,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I