Nope - just busy with the day job...
You could try http://www.lib.ox.ac.uk/jafer/zing/new/srw-bindings.wsdl
which is the draft wsdl I put together when we were first discussing
this. However, I've not had a chance to compare this to what Rob has
implemented or to catch up on what we agreed/haven't agreed yet on this
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LeVan,Ralph [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Friday, April 04, 2003 5:11 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Should I take the surprising silence on the list to mean that
> none of you actually have this working in wsdl, or are you
> all just on vacation?
> Yes, I can hack all sorts of code to get this to work, but if
> we can't point a new implementor to some wsdl and just have
> it work, then the solution is no good.
> I can find no reference to an XMLFragment datatype. I can
> see that an xs:any element (not datatype) inside a recordXML
> element should get me a legal schema, but my wsdl tools seem
> to be ignoring that.
> Still looking for help.
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2003 7:00 PM
> > To: [log in to unmask]
> > Subject: Re: XML Fragment in RecordData
> > > I could use it now. Do we have working examples anywhere?
> > What does the
> > > WSDL turn into?
> > Yep. My system does one of the two proposed methods to
> return XML --
> > it sticks it in recordXML rather than recordData when the
> > recordPacking query param is set to XML
> > Otherwise it returns string.
> > http://srw.o-r-g.org:8080/l5r/?recordPacking=xml&query=ninja
> > R
> > --
> > ,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> > ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> > ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives,
> extension 3142
> > ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet:
> > liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
> > ____/:::::::::::::. WWW:
> I L L U M I N A T I