Mike Taylor wrote:
> > BTW, we have 'all' for and, 'any' for or, but not 'none' for not. I
> > think it'd be consistent and useful to add this in 1.1, especially
> > as it gives us a single clause to express NOT
> > dc.creator none "sanderson dovey levan"
> But we can't express that in Type-1.
And we can express 'all' and 'any' in type-1? Well yes as a matter of fact
we can but not very well -- using (a) bib-1 wordlist or (b) utility set
attributes. For (a) we're not sure which we're saying, 'any' or 'all'; and
for (b) almost nobody has implemented it.
In any case, if you can say "any of these words" it follows that you can
express "none of these words" using boolean and-not.