LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  June 2003

ARSCLIST June 2003

Subject:

Re: ELBERG MD12

From:

Bradleys <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 16 Jun 2003 13:29:43 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (78 lines)

In this thread I referred to binaural sound as stereophony sound. Binaural
sound is the correct term.

Binaural sound is most often recorded using a model of a human head which
has accurately proportioned or approximately proportioned human ears
appropriately positioned on the sides of a more or less realistically shaped
head of human form. Recording microphones placed inside the dummy head hear
the sounds traveling down the dummy's ear canals. The listener must use
headphones or inside the ear canal speaker plugs. The effect of human ears
in collecting sound is included in the recordings. Listening to the sound
recorded from the mics using the external ear characteristics a second time
would spoil the effect. In addition to things already mentioned the listener
has to have the head erect, forward and motionless. Otherwise a very
confusing aural sensory experience will result.

One listening to a binaural sound recording can hear not only the lateral
location of the sound source, as heard by the dummy's head but with three
dimensional location of the sound source that is limited only by the ability
of the listener in ordinary situations to hear where the sound comes from.
For most listeners that ability is better than we may realize. Most people
can determine where sound is (or seems to be) with respect with before or
behind, above or below, and left and right.

Just as things like mirrors can alter our visual perceptions, so that we see
something that is in front of us to be somewhat behind us for example, our
audio perceptions are often altered. Hard sound reflecting surfaces can
alter can change where a sound source is heard to be. In a room we might
hear a voice to be from a person on our right when the person is down a
hallway that connects to the room from which runs towards the left but which
enters the room in front of us. The voice has traveled down the hall,
crossed the room, reflected from the room wall on the right and then reached
our ears from that direction. Binaural sound will not correct such
illusions. The way we would have heard the sound had we been where the
recording dummy head was should be the way we experience the binaural
recording--echoes, distortions, and all.

For binaural to work well the recording and playback equipment should be
better then the human audio system. Frequency response should be flat from
sub-audible to super-audible frequencies. The way that the human audio
system locates sounds in space requires an amazing processing of subtle
changes to sound caused by the shape of the ears. These clues include very
small time delays and other modifications to secondary sounds formed when a
frequency complex directional sound wave front interacts with the listeners
ears as the sound is coupled via our vertically and laterally unsymmetrical
ears into the ear canal before heading down the ear canal towards the ear
drum (tympanic membrane).

Binaural perception would seem to require that when listening to the
recording the sound wave is being recreated inside our own ear canals. That
would seem improbable, how could a wave form be recreated in an ear canal
using a simple non-directional sound source? Binaural is known to work so is
the suggestion that playback must recreate the sound wave in the ear canal
incorrect? By the time sound enters a sufficient distance into the ear canal
the required shaping and directional clues seem to have been reduced to a
sound wave adequately recorded by non-directional means aside from its being
received by the microphone in a particular ear. As far as sound is
concerned, the ear canals are a round tube. The playback equipment generates
sound using a device conveys no physical directional information aside from
the sound being inserted into the appropriate ear.

Listening to binaural sound recording using loud speakers even if they were
located directly beyond our respective left and the right ears would be a
satisfactory binaural experience. The directional clues provided by the
shape of our ears would alter the recorded sound that is already binaurally
encoded by the recording dummy's ears. The consequence is something that we
could not properly interpret as positional information.

When the Web is searched using the term binaural with other appropriate key
words and phrases a wealth of information is found. This includes photos of
the heads of recording dummies and other information and lore and binaural
recordings from short clips to full length binaural recordings in various
formats. Some of the recordings are very old binaural recordings. Software
exists with capabilities to create binaural like effects in sound that is
already recorded.

Ralph Bradley
Family Voices, family archive services

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager