LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1 Archives

PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1  June 2003

PCCTG1 June 2003

Subject:

Re: Input for report

From:

Jimmie Lundgren <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 11 Jun 2003 07:23:01 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (66 lines)

Hi Adam,
        I deliberately did not include "not sure" as an option :-)
        What I am thinking about how this would work in the new scheme that
we are proposing is that (1) Anyone, new or old as a SACO contributor, would
still be able to propose new or changed headings, member or not. This is a
point that we made pretty strongly and that I shared at the BIBCO OpCo
meeting in May. John Mitchell told me he was very happy to hear it, and I
heard no arguments against it. (2) A new kind of membership would become an
option for those who choose to sign on to it with a formal agreement, and
certain benefits which we need to define will be limited to those who choose
to become the new kind of member. Other contributors will not be called
"members" but simply "contributors". Thanks,
Jimmie

-----Original Message-----
From: Adam Schiff [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 11:34 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [PCCTG1] Input for report


1. To make SACO more consistent with other elements of the PCC, a letter
asking for a written commitment to following LC policies, etc. for subject
contributions should be sent by the PCC to those libraries who are
particpants in SACO or other parts of the PCC?
___ YES
___ NO

_X_ NOT SURE!  How would this work in practice for a library that wants to
submit its first SACO proposal?  They would not be allowed to until they
had signed a written commitment?  Would this only be applied to formal
program members?

2. Can you get behind the idea of a goal of 5 records each year for
libraries that make a commitment to joining the SACO program as members?
This is in the context of other libraries and librarians continuing to have
the option of contributing without that commitment.
_X__ YES
___ NO

3. Do you think we need a separate list of SACO libraries for the utilities
to enable subject authority work in the utilities, or will it serve
satisfactorily to expand the capability of those already authorized for
NACO?
_X__Separate list required
___Use NACO list

If BIBCO or CONSER, then one authorization should allow all.  But I think
there are quite a few prolific SACO contributors that are not part of
NACO and I don't think we should require NACO.  Nor do I think they should
have NACO authorization if they don't have the training and approval to
change name headings.

4. As part of the contribution of LC do you want provision of resources such
as Catalogers Desktop or print versions of SCM and LCSH to be provided to
those libraries who make a written commitment to be SACO members?
_X__YES (Which resource(s)?   Print is sufficient. But what about online
access to Classification?  Should that be free if they are going to be
doing classification proposals?  If they commit to doing a certain number
of class. proposals?

___NO


--Adam

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
December 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
June 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
July 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager