> Date: Tue, 3 Jun 2003 09:40:14 -0400
> From: Ray Denenberg <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > For example, I might have a database of METS records.  If I say
> > that I want the simple 'rec' schema, do I want the METS record in
> > rec, or do I want the metadata about the METS record?
>
> The metadata about the METS record. Cleary. I don't see how that can
> be in question.

The very fact that we're discussing this shows that there is a
question!  And for what it's worth, I'd have guessed (no strong
opinion) that the natural interpretation is the opposite to what you
suggested.

Sorry if I'm being dense.  But if that's what we agree we want this to
mean, we definitely need to nail it down in the specs.

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  Remember that "ministry" means "service": if what you do in
         the church doesn't serve the church, it's not a ministry.

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/