On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 04:40:50PM +0100, Robert Sanderson wrote:
> > SearchRetrieveRequests etc.). Also whether this is something that would
> > be required to be implemented in SRU as well as SRW.
>
> That's not something that I'd considered. Specifying it in SRU would be a
> complete nightmare if there was multiple queries. Anything more complex
> than a single query fanned out to multiple databases would be absolutely
> horrifying in SRU.
>
> /metadb/query1=ccg.name any "sword"
> &schema1=http://srw.o-r-g.org/schemas/ccg/1.0/
> &resultSetTTL1=180
> &sortKeys1="/card/name"
> &database1=l5r
> &recordPacking1=xml
> &query2=...
Doesn't look pretty . An efficient client&server will reuse the socket
and we have a train of GET's (or POST's). And that's with version
SRW/SRU 1.0.
GET /db1?query=search1 HTTP/1.0
User-Agent: Wget/1.8.1
Host: localhost:9999
Accept: */*
Connection: Keep-Alive
GET /db2?query=search2 HTTP/1.0
User-Agent: Wget/1.8.1
Host: localhost:9999
Accept: */*^
Connection: Keep-Alive
-- Adam
> *cringe*
>
> Rob
>
> --
> ,'/:. Rob Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::. Twin Cathedrals: telnet: liverpool.o-r-g.org 7777
> ____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://liverpool.o-r-g.org:8000/
> I L L U M I N A T I
--
Adam Dickmeiss mailto:[log in to unmask] http://www.indexdata.dk
Index Data T: +45 33410100 Mob.: 212 212 66
|