Certainly, separate 670s would provide the clearest record of usage--if one
accepts citation of uncataloged documents. I suppose that my fundamental
concern was that others would find it relatively difficult to replicate my
research, although the format Marty suggested, "[Title
of publication], uncataloged work accessed from the [Name] web site, July
17, 2003: |b title screen" would point them in the right direction.
However, I also think about the multitude of sources conveniently (and
vaguely) designated "GU files" and wonder, "What is enough?" ...
University of Georgia Libraries