Paul et al.,
After similar comments from others, Ana and I decided we
wouldn't make this change in LCRI application now. It can be discussed
again.
Judy
>>> [log in to unmask] 07/21/03 04:19PM >>>
Much practice about series has traditionally been, and I feel should
continue to be, locally decided. I am concerned about requiring LC
practice
for 1.6G3 and 1.6H in particular for PCC records. I also do not feel
that
we as a community have enough experience at this point to require PCC
records to follow current LC practice for 9.7B.
Paul J. Weiss
UCSD NACO Coordinator
At 03/07/09 01:41 PM, you wrote:
>cross -posted with apologies
>*******************************************************
>CPSO has posted on its website drafts of LCRIs that will impact
>BIBCO/CONSER cataloging practices:
><http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcris.html>http://lcweb.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/lcris.html
>
>
>In as much as these cataloging decisions often impact all PCC
participants
>comments from all PCC members are invited.
>
>Deadline is July 25. Send all comments to Judy Kuhagen, CPSO
([log in to unmask])
>
_______________________________________
Paul J. Weiss
Head, Monographs Cataloging Division
Catalog Department
UCSD Libraries
858-534-3537
[log in to unmask]
_______________________________________
|