> > Changing the namespace should be a 30 second tweak for most
> > implementations, I would think? But why bother, as that

> i) it isn't good practice to have a namespace which refers to two
> different schemas (which is what we would have)

Yep. True, assuming that we don't abandon the 1.0 schema completely which
is what I was thinking at the time.

Okay, I think everything points towards a new namespace and a new endpoint
for servers that want to support multiple versions.

Rob

--
      ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: telnet: nebmedes.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I