Try Mengelberg, my favorite conductor, and Coppola, whose performance I
prefer to all others, rare for a Mengelberg nut like myself. I took over
Ronald Klett's Willem Mengelberg Society after he died. It consists of
e-mail messages about Heer Mengelberg and his recordings, about two
messages a week. It's free. Just send me an e-message to my other e-mail
address, [log in to unmask], and I'll put you on the list and
send you one long e-mail of all the messages to date for your perusal. I
also run a list of classical music and other arts, about three or four
messages a day. You can get it also by sending me a message at
[log in to unmask]
----- Original Message -----
From: "Aaron Luis Levinson" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, 2003 August 06 8:40 PM
Subject: Re: [ARSCLIST] Bolero by Ravel the definitive version?
I see your point Mike but nevertheless there must be some
memorable versions and others that are not. Let me phrase
my question better:
Are there any renditions of this work that many or even some
fans of this piece find particularly stirring?
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 07:50 PM, Mike Richter wrote:
> At 07:10 PM 8/6/2003 -0400, you wrote:
>> I was wondering whether anyone on this list might be able to steer
>> in the direction of any performance of this work that is considered
>> the benchmark upon which other are judged? I am a neophyte
>> in the "classical" world and any help would be appreciated.
> There is a recording which is sometimes listed as being conducted by
> with the Lamoureux. Unfortunately, the attribution is spurious.
> To my knowledge, there is no one performance which can be considered
> definitive of this or any other substantial work. For example, one
> consider Stravinsky's recordings of his own music "definitive" except
> the 'definition' changes as his interpretation varies in different
> recordings of the same work.
> [log in to unmask]