LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ZNG Archives


ZNG Archives

ZNG Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ZNG Home

ZNG Home

ZNG  August 2003

ZNG August 2003

Subject:

Re: Betr.: Re: xPath in searchRequest

From:

Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative

Date:

Wed, 6 Aug 2003 16:24:36 +0100

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (69 lines)

On Wed, 6 Aug 2003, Theo van Veen wrote:

> Rob, I understand that you propose to just return a diagnostic saying "I
> cannot do this", but I should have looked in the explain record to find
> out and try to find a known schema or just ignore this database.

Yes. Exactly. That's why we have explain and diagnostics, right?

> I prefer the possibility of returning a diagnostic saying "I cannot do
> this" and returning unsollicited short records (for which we have to
> define a schema), so the user is informed about the existance of these
> records and is even allowed to request the native XML records or perhaps
> with a servers default stylesheet reference.

The client is informed of the existence of the records by the number of
records in the result set parameter in the response.
Much like unsollicited email or flyers in my letter box, unsollicted
records are likely to be completely useless to me as they're not something
I've asked for.

With records you can ignore them if they're not useful, but there are
other situations that are just downright dangerous... I ask for string
escaped records and you only support XML records... my
(hypothetical) client then blows up completely when it gets back XML where
it expects a string.

The client asks to sort by publication date. You can't do that so instead
sort by date of acquisition as that's kind of close. Now it looks like
it's sorted as most acquisitions are for recent material, but in fact it's
completely wrong.
And how do you say, in a machine understandable way, 'I didn't do what you
asked, I instead sorted by acquisition date' with a /raftload/ of
diagnostics for all possible things that a server could do?

The client asks for 20 records. You return 25. The display logic gets
completely messed up.
Client asks for authors that are exactly 'John Smith'. You return matches
for John Smithers and Joan Smithy as they're kind of right. The results
are simply -wrong-.

> In terms of your "nail-example" according to your proposal the seller
> would say "no we do not have number 5" and according to my proposal the
> seller would say "we do not have number 5 but we have number 6".

At risk of turning Matthew irate at the continued example:

You looked at their price list (explain information). It says that there
are nails (record schema) and you have them in different sizes, and to ask
for which size (xPath support). You ask for specifically number 5 nails
(xpath in record schema). Rather than saying 'We don't have number 5
nails' and waiting to see what you'd like instead, the shop just gives you
something you might want but might not want (alternate record schema
which maybe has nothing to do with your xpath request at all) Perhaps the
server gives you screws or bolts, which are similar to nails but
are in fact completely useless (no handler for the record type).

If I wanted lowest common denominator (nails of any size/simple DC), I
would have asked for it.

Rob

--
      ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: telnet: nebmedes.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

July 2017
October 2016
July 2016
August 2014
February 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
February 2013
January 2013
October 2012
August 2012
April 2012
January 2012
October 2011
May 2011
April 2011
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager