Client can send either the short name or the long name?  (I vote for that.)

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theo van Veen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:48 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Betr.: Re: Short Names Proposal
>
>
> Just to make sure:
> The client searches for the short name in the Zeerex record find the
> full URI for the short name and then sends the full URI over the wire?
> Am I correct?
>
> Theo
>
>
> >>> [log in to unmask] 8/27/03 4:05:34 nm >>>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, LeVan,Ralph wrote:
>
> > > > This is just a ZeeRex change, right?  So I don't think it
> > > > an SRW 1.1 proposal.  We can just go ahead and change the ZeeRex
> DTD
> > > > and documentation, and have done.
> > > > Am I missing something?
> > >
> > > It affects SRW clients in that they'll need to change from
> > > using the full URI to the short name.
>
> > They'll need to change to short names?  I hope you meant
> that they'll
> have
> > the opportunity to use short names.
>
> I mean when parsing the ZeeRex file, they'll need to look for short
> names
> in the configInfo section, rather than that they'll need to send the
> short
> name when requesting the schema over the wire :)
>
> Rob
>
> --
>       ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
>     ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
>   ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  telnet: nebmedes.o-r-g.org 7777
> ____/:::::::::::::.                WWW:
> http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
>
> I L L U M I N A T I
>