Client can send either the short name or the long name? (I vote for that.)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theo van Veen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:48 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Betr.: Re: Short Names Proposal
> Just to make sure:
> The client searches for the short name in the Zeerex record find the
> full URI for the short name and then sends the full URI over the wire?
> Am I correct?
> >>> [log in to unmask] 8/27/03 4:05:34 nm >>>
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2003, LeVan,Ralph wrote:
> > > > This is just a ZeeRex change, right? So I don't think it
> > > > an SRW 1.1 proposal. We can just go ahead and change the ZeeRex
> > > > and documentation, and have done.
> > > > Am I missing something?
> > >
> > > It affects SRW clients in that they'll need to change from
> > > using the full URI to the short name.
> > They'll need to change to short names? I hope you meant
> that they'll
> > the opportunity to use short names.
> I mean when parsing the ZeeRex file, they'll need to look for short
> in the configInfo section, rather than that they'll need to send the
> name when requesting the schema over the wire :)
> ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: telnet: nebmedes.o-r-g.org 7777
> ____/:::::::::::::. WWW:
> I L L U M I N A T I