LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC Archives

ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC  September 2003

ISOJAC September 2003

Subject:

FW: Announcement: W3C Recommendation to ISO regarding Commercial Licensing of ISO Codes

From:

"Patton,Glenn" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 11:23:57 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (122 lines)

-----Original Message-----
From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 12:26 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Returned Mail: Error During Delivery


    ---- Failed Recipients ----

<[log in to unmask]>
I don't know if other JAC members were aware of this ISO proposal?

--Glenn


-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Bratt [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 3:30 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Announcement: W3C Recommendation to ISO regarding Commercial
Licensing of ISO Codes



Dear Advisory Committee Representative:

I would like to draw your attention to a matter requiring your urgent
attention.

As some of you may know, ISO is considering a proposal to charge licensing
fees for the commercial use of several ISO codes.  In fact, ANSI is
apparently already doing so.  The codes under consideration and the
possible impacts of this proposal on W3C specifications and the Web are
summarized in the text below.

The Hypertext Coordination Group (representing the W3C's HTML, CSS, MMI,
DOM, I18N, and Voice Browser Activities), along with W3C Member
organizations, told us they believe that a swift, firm response from W3C is
needed.  A poll of the Advisory Board over the past 24 hours has also
produced clear support for such action. The Advisory Board further
recommended that the full W3C Membership be alerted to the situation and of
the possibility to respond to your national ISO member organization.

There is an urgency to this matter, as we just found out Tuesday from the
President of ISO, Dr. Oliver Smoot, that this topic will be on the agenda
of the ISO Council this coming Saturday, 20 September.

Below is the text of an email that we are sending today to Dr. Smoot. If
you wish to contact your national ISO member organization to register your
opinion on the ISO proposal, here is the contact information for each of
the ISO members:
http://www.iso.org/iso/en/aboutiso/isomembers/MemberList.MemberSummary?MEMBE
RCODE=10

If you have any questions or comments, please let me know and/or post your
mail to

         [log in to unmask]

Best Regards,

Steve Bratt
Chief Operating Officer


=========================================================

Text of message to Oliver Smoot

=========================================================

To:  Dr. Oliver Smoot, President, International Organization for
Standardization

Dear Dr. Smoot,

The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) wishes to express its deep concerns
over a recent proposal by the ISO Commercial Policies Steering Group (CPSG)
to charge fees for the commercial use of ISO codes such as ISO 639
(language codes), ISO 3166 (country codes), and ISO 4127 (currency codes).

These and similar codes are widely used on the Web. In particular the
language and country codes are of direct interest to W3C and the users
of W3C Recommendations in the context of HTTP, HTML and XML and various
other technologies. Language and country codes currently provide a single,
standard way of identifying languages (and locales) throughout the Web.
Multilingual Web sites and Web pages, as well as internationalization and
localization features, would be particularly affected.

Any charges for the use of these standards are going to lead to
fragmentation, delay in deployment, and in effect a lack of
standardization. In particular, those users who depend upon multi-lingual
or non-English language services will suffer.

In their considerations, the CPSG notes "the necessity for a number
of ISO standards to be published as databases". Web technology today
allows publication and reuse of data at a small fraction of the
costs a few years ago. If it is the case that the costs of maintaining
these databases is beyond ISO's capacity to cover, we would suggest that
ISO open a discussion with the larger user community about how these
services might be hosted in a manner that covers these costs.

Given that this policy would have profound impact not only on ISO,
but also on industry and users of the Web at large, we urge ISO to
further consider this policy and its broader implications and
consequences, and to reassure the community as quickly as possible
that there will be no charges for the use of these standards.

Best regards,

Tim Berners-Lee, W3C Director
Steven R. Bratt, W3C Chief Operating Officer



--
Steven R Bratt, Chief Operating Officer     mailto:[log in to unmask]
World Wide Web Consortium   http://www.w3.org
MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
200 Technology Square, Room NE43-352
Cambridge, MA 02139, USA / Voice: +1.617.253.7697 / Fax: +1.617.258.5999

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
January 2021
November 2020
June 2020
May 2019
February 2019
September 2018
April 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
May 2016
April 2016
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager