Seem fine to me (not least of all since I suggested we needed to allow
relations to be extended in the same way that indexes were some time
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Z39.50 Next-Generation Initiative [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> On Behalf Of Mike Taylor
> Sent: Friday, September 12, 2003 5:01 PM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: CQL Profiling Proposal
> Dear Fellow ZNGers,
> In consultation with Eliot Christian, Adam Dickmeiss, Sebastian Hammer
> and Rob Sanderson, I have written up a proposal for making CQL
> amenable to profiling efforts, so that it becomes able to support the
> requirements of esoteric communities such as the GEO people and
> hopefully the Chemical Abstracts folk. We would like to discuss this
> (or better still, just rubber-stamp it :-) at the forthcoming meeting
> in Washington DC.
> The proposal is at
> A fair amount of that document is background material, so if you're in
> a hurry, you might like to skip straight to section 4 (Proposal).
> Please read and comment.
> /o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]>
> )_v__/\ "I can't believe I wrote this" -- Henry Spencer, in the
> documentation for "awf", an awk implementation of nroff.
> Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at