> Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2003 11:26:00 +0100
> From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
>
> My 'obvious' alternative name would be a CQL namespace, after XML
> namespaces which look similar and achieve the same end. In an XML
> oriented world, 'attribute set' would likely be construed as 'a
> collection of xml attribute nodes' which is certainly not what we
> want to imply.

Yes.

> That said, I prefer 'context' as it still carries the same sort of
> feel without getting confused as to what we're talking about when
> you say things like 'the srw namespace'.

Yes.

(I would like to go on and do my Meg-Ryan-in-a-cafe impression, but
you've not given me enough separate things to agree with.)

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "MS-Windows: just another pane in the glass" -- Jeff Covey.

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/