> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 4:20 PM
>
> Yeuch.   I've always thought of prefixes as the least
> important part of CQL, only there as a (valuable)
> afterthought to reduce the dependance on Explain.

I'll second that!  I'd be happy if it went away.

Since the parser writers are the ones that want it, I guess I can't
complain.  I'm hoping that all that baloney is invisible to me and the
prefix will be replaced with the equivalent URI as part of the index name
when I walk the parsed tree.

Ralph