> Janifer alerted me to some broken links at the "proposals" page
> http://lcweb.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw/srw1-1-proposals.html
> and I think I've fixed most of them. Please review this page and send me any
> additional information, links, etc.

Concerning my point 11, and Mike's currently unlisted proposal
(http://zing.z3950.org/cql/profiles.html), I don't think that they're
mutually exclusive, even though it's listed as 'rejected' in Mike's
proposal.  Rejected in the sense that it's not a general solution to new
user communities taking up CQL.

Within and Encloses should be part of the same 'set' of relations as any,
all, and the various symbols, as they're applicable across many different
domains.  Otherwise everyone will just need to add them to their own
set, making a large headache. (eg for date searches, which was Ralph's
original question)

Rob

--
      ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  telnet: nebmedes.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::.                WWW: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I