> Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 14:43:29 +0100
> From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
>
> [boundingRect(13N25W,25S70E)] is a valid cql term without ""s...
Nope.
> (as there are no spaces)
But the open paren is a special character ... which is why it's
posible to parse queries like:
foo and(bar or baz )
> I like the relation modifier approach, personally. When a relation
> structural modifier is defined, then there obviously needs to be a
> structure along with it.
>
> time within/IsoDate "2003-10-10 2003-11-20"
>
> rather than
>
> time within "[isoDate(2003-10-10)] [isoDate(2003-11-20)]"
Yes, this is a compelling line of reasoning.
_/|_ _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "If you really want to be a writer, develop calluses on your
pride" -- Adrian Bedford.
--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/
|