LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ISOJAC Archives


ISOJAC Archives

ISOJAC Archives


[email protected]


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC Home

ISOJAC  October 2003

ISOJAC October 2003

Subject:

Reuse of RE: Country symbol "CS"

From:

Infopoint <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

ISO 639 Joint Advisory Committee <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 1 Oct 2003 14:45:00 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (76 lines)

*This message was transferred with a trial version of CommuniGate(tm) Pro*
Dear Colleagues,

I think, by now we all agree that the re-use of "CS" is most unfortunate.
This statement is not meant as a criticism.

Even ISO 639-1/RA and the ISO 639/RAs-JAC have underestimated the total
range of consequences and impact of this reuse in the beginning of the
discussion. The BSI representative mentiones in his response that one
library catalogue alone has 18000 records that would need to be changed in
case CS were to be reused. Most members don't seem to have undertaken
similar studies. We find it likely that more representatives would see the
practical problems with a change if such studies were conducted, although I
think that we all know what such studies would reveal.

No individual expert, no group (and even no nation) is fool-proof of making
bad decisions. It is, however, a matter of professionality and leadership in
expertise to show the flexibility to remedy a bad decision as soon as
possible.

In our opinion the solution out of the dilemma could be

-    to rescind/withdraw CS=Serbia and Montenegro (for good reasons, which
should also be obvious to the country most affected) and block this symbol
forever,
-    to propose a suitable new country symbol.
(In this connection, it must be made clear to the parties concerned that a
country symbol is not a matter of ideology, but primarily a pragmatic tool
to ease information interchange)

In any case this issue has shown two important necessities:

(1)     Given the fact that there will always remain the need for archiving
certain data possibly even for centuries (in an increasingly networking
world) the principle of non-reuse of once assigned code-symbols is of utmost
importance. If a code-symbol has to be changed, the old symbol must be
blocked forever!!!
(2)     Given the increased importance of standardized coding systems (and
increasingly interlinked/combined coding systems) in the world of
m-computing and m-commerce, ISO needs a policy for guaranteeing stable
coding systems.

The need for a total strictness in this matter is rather new. It is what is
quite astounding supported by celebrities from academia, such as Tim
Berners-Lee etc.

On behalf of ISO 639/RAs-JAC I would like to appeal to ISO 3166/MA not to
scruple too much about formalities etc. and take the appropriate measures. I
would further like to suggest that we tie up with other standardized coding
communities to establish a standardized framework of principles and rules
for stable coding. If we all together can achieve this goal, we would have
paved one of the paths towards smooth m-computing and m-commerce in the
future.

I would VERY much appreciate it, if ISO 3166/MA could consider our appeal
and come up not only with a luke-warm compromise, but with a good decision
concerning CS.


Yours truly

Christian Galinski
Secretary of ISO/TC 37
Present Chairman of ISO 639/RAs-JAC

******************************************************************
Dr. Christian Galinski, Director
Infoterm - International Information Centre for Terminology
Aichholzgasse 6/12, A-1120 Vienna, Austria
Tel.: +43 1 817 4488;        Fax: +43 1 817 4488-44
[log in to unmask] -
http://linux.infoterm.org/>http://linux.infoterm.org
Founded in 1971 by UNESCO to promote and organize
co-operation in the field of terminology worldwide
******************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

April 2021
January 2021
November 2020
June 2020
May 2019
February 2019
September 2018
April 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
May 2016
April 2016
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
May 2013
April 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager