LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1 Archives

PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1  October 2003

PCCTG1 October 2003

Subject:

Re: STOP: New version of draft

From:

Jimmie Lundgren <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:30:22 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (53 lines)

Hi Mary Charles,
        Thank you for your comments.
        The current BIBCO training program does include a small section on
proposing subject headings, but maybe that was not the case with your
particular training.
        If there are some particular important points you would like to have
inserted as minority opinions, would you please write them out and send them
to us them so that we can decide as a group about including them?
        Thanks and best regards,
Jimmie

-----Original Message-----
From: Lasater, Mary C [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 4:07 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [PCCTG1] STOP: New version of draft


Jimmie & All,

I hope others with more "English" background will do more editing
but I have a few spots for comments that will hopefully help the
report.

In the first paragraph:


> Through SACO many useful changes and additions have been proposed
> and adopted over this time, and the often-heard criticism that LC
> is unresponsive to change can be answered.

I am not sure that the criticism was LC... it was most often LCSH
and sometimes LCC. For simplicity could we change this to  "LC
Subject Headings?

Toward the end under training:

 The BIBCO training
> program includes a session devoted to SACO that is very helpful,
> and proposal-specific input from experts at LC is also extremely
> valuable for building greater expertise in preparing subject
> heading proposals.

 I don't remember any SACO training as part of our Bibco training.
I have previously commented on the Day 5 training as part of the
NACO program and how positively it has been received at the
institutions that I have trained.

As for the report, I've already made lots of comments, many of
which were out of sync with these recommendations.

Mary Charles

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
December 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
June 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
July 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager