LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1 Archives

PCCTG1 Archives


PCCTG1@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1 Home

PCCTG1  October 2003

PCCTG1 October 2003

Subject:

Re: STOP: New version of draft

From:

Adam Schiff <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Program for Cooperative Cataloging <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 17 Oct 2003 14:23:11 -0700

Content-Type:

TEXT/PLAIN

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

TEXT/PLAIN (113 lines)

Have a good weekend Hugh.

Adam  (still working, 2:23 pm Friday here) ;-)

**************************************
* Adam L. Schiff                     *
* Principal Cataloger                *
* University of Washington Libraries *
* Box 352900                         *
* Seattle, WA 98195-2900             *
* (206) 543-8409                     *
* (206) 685-8782 fax                 *
* [log in to unmask]           *
**************************************

On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Hugh Taylor wrote:

> With one exception I agree with all of Susan's comments - and am
> particularly grateful that she remembered what a pain in the neck
> diacritics currently are (not sure *how* I came to miss that myself!).
>
> > 2. In the section Membership Benefits, in the paragraph starting
> > "Utility-based submission.."
> > Do you want to put in a mention that CPSO would retain final editorial
> > review and would
> > then produce the records in the utility?  (I think it's good to emphasize
> > this.)
>
> I agree with the first half of this comment, but feel the workflow aspect
> is too specific -  I'd have expected CPSO would want these records, once
> they've been signed off by the Member, to be worked on (by CPSO, and maybe
> Coop - it doesn't matter) inside LC's Voyager system, rather than on the
> relevant utility. In any case, it's a level of detail we don't need to go
> into in our report, I feel. But the rest is all good to my eyes.
>
> Sorry to make you folks feel envious - esp. Adam, way out on the west of my
> map - but I'm done for this week, and am heading home. Have a good weekend,
> all of you.
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Hugh
> --
> Hugh Taylor
> Head, Collection Development and Description
> Cambridge University Library
> West Road, Cambridge CB3 9DR, England
>
> email: [log in to unmask]   fax: +44 (0)1223 333160
> phone: +44 (0)1223 333069 (with voicemail) or
> phone: +44 (0)1223 333000 (ask for pager 036)
>
> Susan Summer wrote:
> >
> > Jimmie and others:
> >
> > I have some comments on the draft sent out yesterday.  Rather than
> > interspersing
> > them in the text, I'll note the places.  I hope that's OK.
> >
> > Starting at the beginning--
> >
> > 1. In the paragraph starting "The mandate for this work..." where we talk
> > about the
> > Charles Fenly report, how about "which examined the SACO program workflow in
> > some detail and outlined possible improvements."
> >
> > 2. In the section Membership Benefits, in the paragraph starting
> > "Utility-based submission.."
> > Do you want to put in a mention that CPSO would retain final editorial
> > review and would
> > then produce the records in the utility?  (I think it's good to emphasize
> > this.)
> >
> > 3. In the section Web-based training - we mention that this could
> > incorporate some of the
> > materials developed for the in-person workshops and some of the material
> > from the SACO
> > Participants' Manual.  I would also add that the web-based training could
> > incorporate some
> > of the valuable material already on the PCC SACO webpage, such as the FAQ
> > and the list
> > of web resources, etc.
> >
> > 4. In the next session, Processes -- Where we have some of the drawbacks
> > listed ("It does not
> > permit saving..."), I would also add that it requires diacritics to be
> > written out such as [acute].
> > And then later in that paragraph, being able to enter diacritics should be
> > listed as an advantage
> > of utility-based submission.
> >
> > 5. And don't you want Jimmie Lundgren, University of Florida, Chair to be
> > the first name on
> > the list?!
> >
> > (I'll be out of the office Oct. 20-23 but will try to check email if possible.)
> >
> > Susan
> >
> > At 12:57 PM 10/16/2003 -0400, you wrote:
> > >Dear SACO Task Group,
> > >         If you haven't had time to review my previous messages yet, please
> > >toss them out and respond to the draft below. It is continuing to evolve
> > >with your help, and I hope to hear something from each of you in the near
> > >future so that we may still meet the deadline. Especially, please tell me if
> > >there are parts of the charge the report fails to address or if you disagree
> > >with anything or feel we can express it in a better way. I really hate
> > >criticism, but I much prefer that it happen before we send it as a final
> > >report and we have to live with it forever :-)
> > >         Thanks and best regards,
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
August 2019
July 2019
May 2019
April 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
October 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
December 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
June 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
July 2000

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager