> It might be better to have such post meeting discussion on the list ;-)
*grins* I thought it was just an open and shut case, but as with all such
things...
> Errrm, looking at the revisions to the notes as they happen:
> "Therefore version 1.1 and 1.00001 are identical (as 00001 is the same
> integer as 1), "
> Is there a precedent for this - in projects I've been involved in 1.01
> and 1.1 have always been different versions
I can take that out, as we'll never define 1.00001 it's irrelevant.
It was just something which came up at the meeting so stuck in my mind.
R
--
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: telnet: nebmedes.o-r-g.org 7777
____/:::::::::::::. WWW: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I
|