> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:24:15 +0000
> From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
>
> > > And the cql context set -- do we assume that its version is the same
> > > as the cql version?
> >
> > I don't think that's a good idea.  Clients that care enough to want to
>
> Oh :(  Actually, as 'cql' is reserved and can only ever point at the
> current CQL set [...]

Really?!  Reference, please.  I thought I was quite at liberty to say
        >cql="http://loc.gov/indexes/dublinCore" cql.title=dinosaur

> > BTW., Rob, the CQL set's documentation at
> >         http://srw.o-r-g.org/cql/contextSets/cql.html
> > has gone away.
>
> That would now be at cql/context-sets/cql.html, ala Ray's preference
> for - lowercase rather than camelCase (meaning that he can just
> unzip the whole set of docs rather than searching for links to
> rename)

Grr.  OK, makes sense.  [One quick trawl through all my web documents
patching up the URL's later ...]  Alright, done.

BTW, the URLs I have at the moment are:

CQL Context Set
  Description: http://srw.o-r-g.org/cql/context-sets/cql.html
  Identifier: http://www.loc.gov/zing/cql/context-sets/cql/v1.1/

Record Metadata Context Set
  Description: http://srw.o-r-g.org/indexSets/rec/1.0/
  Identifier: http://srw.o-r-g.org/indexSets/rec/1.0/

There are some obvious inconsistencies here.  Are there newer URIs for
description or identifier that I don't know about?  Or are there plans
to consistencyify these?  And can we lose the "v" from the "v1.1" in
the CQL identifier?  I don't think we use that in anything else.

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "There's something Newtonian about paleontology: every
         conclusion produces an equal and opposite conclusion" --
         Brian M. McCarthy

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/