> > On the other hand, we shouldn't have the Diagnostic schema or ZeeRex
> > listed, as those are required for protocol reasons, rather than
> > minimum level interoperability reasons.  Right?

> Whether the diagnostic schema  and ZeeRex are "required for protocol
> reasons" is a philosophical debate that we decided (at the August meeting)
> to dodge, by declaring a "base profile" in lieu of a document citing

Sort of.  Yes, servers are required to support them in the 'base profile',
but that doesn't say either way whether you should declare them as
supported in the ZeeRex record.

My preference is no, as you don't retrieve the record in the diagnostic
schema or ZeeRex.

Rob

--
      ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
____/:::::::::::::.
I L L U M I N A T I