Robert Sanderson wrote:
>>Wouldn't the schema and protocol spec be shorter if version was outside
>>"operation", i.e.
>>
>>
>
>Yes, but SOAP expects one element to be within <env:Body> (as far as I can
>recall)
>
>
Can't see that requirement in the SOAP spec, but if SOAP (RPC) toolkits
cannot work with it, fine.
>So it would try to find a 'version' operation to handle (if it even got
>that far before complaining)
>
>
If you are using RPC style. But that that's not what the SRW WSDL says.
Anyway, just a thought.
-- Adam
>Rob
>
>--
> ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
>,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
>____/:::::::::::::.
>I L L U M I N A T I
>
>
>
|