Robert Sanderson wrote:

>>>I take it you partner didn't understand Mike's example
>>>title = ((dinosaur and bird) or dinobird)
>>>as well, then..
>>>
>>>
>>I told her to ignore it as it's not official CQL, but she probably
>>understood it. With no other indexes then it's understandable, it's when
>>you add the new indexes, relation modifiers and such like that it becomes
>>complicated.
>>
>>
>
>So what about:
>
>searchTerm ::= term | '(' searchTerm boolean term ')'
>
>
It's a step forward. But a complicated one in order to achive 33% of the
goal :)

-- Adam

>
>(BTW, minor minor nits:
>1)
> boolean ::= booleanTokesn [modifierList]
> booleanTokens ::= 'and' | 'or' | 'not' | 'prox'
>is slightly more consistent.
>
>2)
>'<>' is omitted from the list of tokens.
>
>3)
>namedComparator is referenced as namedComparitor
> ^^^ ^^^
>
>
Alan?

-- Adam

>Rob
>
>
>--
> ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
>,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
>____/:::::::::::::.
>I L L U M I N A T I
>
>
>