LeVan,Ralph wrote:
>Has anyone noticed that Theo is talking about parameters before the '?' and
>Eliot is talking about them after the '?'.
>
>I don't think you get to stick parameters in front of the '?'.
>
>
Yep. We want parameters after ?. Just like forms/CGI has worked for the
last 10 years.
-- Adam
>Ralph
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Theo van Veen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:56 AM
>To: [log in to unmask]
>Subject: Re: SRU examples
>
>
>This is OK. It is not the intention to have official SRU parameters to
>preceed "?". It is
>just that it should be possible to have parameters being part of the
>base-url without the
>client being aware of that parameters and in such a case the base-url may
>end with
>"&" rather than "?". An SRU request is in my opion baseurl + request. The
>base-url is
>a given thing and the request is build by the client. The operation is part
>of the SRU
>request and therefore a client has to be aware that parameter.
>
>Theo
>
>
>On 22 Dec 2003 at 14:48, Janifer Gatenby wrote:
>
>
>
>>Here is a new version of SRU examples taking into account comments by
>>
>>
>Ralph
>
>
>>and Matthew on 19th December. Currently the "?" precedes operation in the
>>URL. I realise that this may in fact change again following Eliot's and
>>Theo's comments. Regardless of where it is finally put, we should add some
>>explanatory text in the SRU URL access mechanism document.
>>
>>Janifer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
|