On Tue, 23 Dec 2003, Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress wrote:
> Can we add a flag where the client says either "must be one of these" or "if
> you can't support any of these select another one".

Sure.

> "In the event where, if the server cannot support any schemas in the list
> then the client wishes the server to select an alternative schema, it is
> recommended to omit the recordSchema parameter (thus if the server does not
> support the extension, non-support will be transparent). In the event where,
> if the server cannot support any schemas in the list then the client does
> not want the server to select an alternative schema, it is recommended to
> include recordSchema parameter (similarly, if the server does not support
> the extension, non-support will be transparent)."

Sounds good.

Rob

--
      ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
____/:::::::::::::.
I L L U M I N A T I