Fine by me also,
Theo

>>> [log in to unmask] 2-12-03 13:26:30 >>>
Fine by me.

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:07 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Scan
>
>
> A couple of things to do with the scan request:
>
> 1.  Can we renamed 'numberOfTerms' as 'maximumTerms' to be
> more consistent
>     with 'maximumRecords' from the search request?
>
> 2.  'startRecord' and 'maximumRecords' are both optional in the
search
>     request.  Can responsePosition and numberOfTerms be
> optional. Like the
>     search request, maximum would be server determined (in
> Explain) and
>     response would default to 1.
>
> Just cosmetic changes, but more consistent with the search request.
>
> Rob
>
> --
>       ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
>     ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
>   ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension
3142
> ,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
> ____/:::::::::::::.
> I L L U M I N A T I
>