Good idea about adding SRW/U as a protocol.

In your list of link types, you have SRW but not SRU. You definitely need
SRU links. But, what would an SRW link look like? I'm not sure there is
such a thing.

I'll be honest. The list of configInfo is long and looks comprehensive and
I won't hesitate to suggest additions later.

Ralph

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 6:45 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: 1.1 Release Date
>
>
> What date shall we shoot for, so I can update the date in the
> docs before
> sending them to Ray?
>
> Things that need to happen:
>
> Matthew: We need the new schemas and WSDL, preferably ASAP
> so that people
> can try them out in their toolkits before they go live, to prevent the
> issues of 1.0
>
> Everyone: Please read over my Zeerex changes proposal to
> accomodate 1.1.
> Even a 'Yes, I agree' is fine.
> http://www.indexdata.dk/pipermail/ex-plain/2003-November/000760.html
> http://www.indexdata.dk/pipermail/ex-plain/2003-November/000761.html
> http://www.indexdata.dk/pipermail/ex-plain/2003-November/000762.html
>
> Rob: Double check documentation, change dates and send to Ray.
>
> Thanks :)
>
> Rob
>
> --
> ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
> ,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
> ____/:::::::::::::.
> I L L U M I N A T I
>