> Two:
> I was assuming that a schema did not have to be an XML schema. I will
> make on if needed.

On our list of record syntaxes, we have EAD and Onix which don't (as far
as I know) have official XML schemas.  They do have DTDs, however, which
would allow validation, if a client so desired.  So going by current
working practice, a DTD or Schema is okay.

Rob

--
      ,'/:.          Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::.        http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::.      Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::.    Nebmedes:  http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
____/:::::::::::::.
I L L U M I N A T I