> > Specifically I think Rob's saying "the value of recordSchema within
> > record within records, in the response, must be the same as the
> > value of recordSchema in the request, if supplied (and if the record
> > is not a diagnostic) [...]
>
> Yes, that's right. I am very surprised that you say this is not in
> the existing specifications, I suppose I (and others?) had been taking
> it for granted. I propose then that we add it forthwith.

The value of records/record/recordSchema must be the URI for the
recordSchema in the request unless one of the following conditions occurs:

1. The request did not specify a recordSchema and the server has chosen a
   default, in which case it is the URI for this default.
2. The record is a surrogate diagnostic, in which case it is the URI for
   the diagnostic schema.
3. The response semantics have been modified via a profiled extension in
   extraRequestData.

Rob

--
      ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
    ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
  ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
____/:::::::::::::.
I L L U M I N A T I