> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:26:09 +0000
> From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
> I think that we should allow context sets to define semantics for
> extraData in the response.
My gut reaction: NO WAY!
> For example, a context Set might say:
> If you send the relation modifier rel.CORI then you should be
> prepared to accept the <rel:rank> <rel:score> and <rel:rawScore>
> elements in extraTermData.
> I'm sure there's a better example, but here's at least one scenario
> that doesn't seem too far fetched where you wouldn't have
> extraRequestData, but would have extraData in the response.
I really don't know. I'll be interested to see what others think.
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "Is there a doctor in the fish?" -- Eric Idle, "Baron
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at