> Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2003 22:26:09 +0000
> From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
>
> I think that we should allow context sets to define semantics for
> extraData in the response.

My gut reaction: NO WAY!

However --

> For example, a context Set might say:
>
> If you send the relation modifier rel.CORI then you should be
> prepared to accept the <rel:rank> <rel:score> and <rel:rawScore>
> elements in extraTermData.

Hmm.  Interesting.

> I'm sure there's a better example, but here's at least one scenario
> that doesn't seem too far fetched where you wouldn't have
> extraRequestData, but would have extraData in the response.
>
> (Right?)

I really don't know.  I'll be interested to see what others think.

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "Is there a doctor in the fish?" -- Eric Idle, "Baron
         Munchhausen"

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/