Theo van Veen wrote:
>No, I'm not talking about parameters before the "?". I'm talking about
>the possibility that the base-url contains parameters, but after "?".
>
>For example a base-url like:
>
>http://myserver.com/my-cgi/mysrw.pl?database=abc&
>
>The client can stick the request after the base-url without having to
>know that "database=abc" is a parameter. This implies that the "?" is
>part of the base-url and should not be added again.
>
>
FWIW, that's what we do. Was afraid to tell anyone:) If database is
defined, that is used. If not defined, the path preceding ? is taken as
database. Maybe database is a bad name.
-- Adam
>Theo
>
>
>
>
>
>>>>[log in to unmask] 12/22 11:19 >>>
>>>>
>>>>
>LeVan,Ralph wrote:
>
>
>
>>Has anyone noticed that Theo is talking about parameters before the
>>
>>
>'?' and
>
>
>>Eliot is talking about them after the '?'.
>>
>>I don't think you get to stick parameters in front of the '?'.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>Yep. We want parameters after ?. Just like forms/CGI has worked for
>the
>last 10 years.
>
>-- Adam
>
>
>
>>Ralph
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Theo van Veen [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
>>Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 9:56 AM
>>To: [log in to unmask]
>>Subject: Re: SRU examples
>>
>>
>>This is OK. It is not the intention to have official SRU parameters
>>
>>
>to
>
>
>>preceed "?". It is
>>just that it should be possible to have parameters being part of the
>>base-url without the
>>client being aware of that parameters and in such a case the base-url
>>
>>
>may
>
>
>>end with
>>"&" rather than "?". An SRU request is in my opion baseurl + request.
>>
>>
>The
>
>
>>base-url is
>>a given thing and the request is build by the client. The operation is
>>
>>
>part
>
>
>>of the SRU
>>request and therefore a client has to be aware that parameter.
>>
>>Theo
>>
>>
>>On 22 Dec 2003 at 14:48, Janifer Gatenby wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>Here is a new version of SRU examples taking into account comments
>>>
>>>
>by
>
>
>>>
>>>
>>Ralph
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>and Matthew on 19th December. Currently the "?" precedes operation
>>>
>>>
>in the
>
>
>>>URL. I realise that this may in fact change again following Eliot's
>>>
>>>
>and
>
>
>>>Theo's comments. Regardless of where it is finally put, we should add
>>>
>>>
>some
>
>
>>>explanatory text in the SRU URL access mechanism document.
>>>
>>>Janifer
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
|