> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 12:06:47 +0000
> From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
>
> A couple of things to do with the scan request:
>
> 1. Can we renamed 'numberOfTerms' as 'maximumTerms' to be more consistent
> with 'maximumRecords' from the search request?
Fine by me.
> 2. 'startRecord' and 'maximumRecords' are both optional in the search
> request. Can responsePosition and numberOfTerms be optional.
Surely if you (for some bizarre reason) omit startRecord from the
request, that's all the more reason you want the response to tell you
the responsePosition is chose? Likewise numberOfTerms.
_/|_ _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ "I think it should either be unrestricted garnishing, or a
single Olympic standard mayonaisse" -- Monty Python.
--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/
|