----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Sanderson" <[log in to unmask]>
> > Ok, I've set the identifier back to
> > http://www.loc.gov/zing/cql/dc-indexes/v1.0/
> > Of course that means back to "dc-indexes" but that shouldn't matter,
these
> > identifiers are supposed to be opaque.
>
> I'd vaguely prefer .../cql/context-sets/dc/v1.0/
> but it's at least not 'index-set', and DC does just define indexes.
> Also, as you say, it's just an opaque string.

The only reason for setting it back to
http://www.loc.gov/zing/cql/dc-indexes/v1.0/
is to leave it unchanged (not anything to do with index vs. context); even
then, I don't feel strongly, but am just a bit uneasy about changing the id
when the definition hasn't changed.  When we go, say, to version 1.1 (or
2.0) certainly we would use "context" rather than "index".