> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:17:36 +0000
> From: Robert Sanderson <[log in to unmask]>
>
> Should Profiles be required to have their own URI identifier, rather than
> just a short name?
>
> Eg: http://srw.cheshire3.org/profiles/ccg/1.0/  vs 'ccg'

Oh damn.  Yes, we need URIs.

> [snip]
> So, after all that, I'm in favor of having just a URI to identify a
> profile, rather than a short name or short name + uri.

I think I agree.  It'll still be _called_ "the CCG profile" when
people talk about it, but there's no need to enshrine that name in
ZeeRex records.

I guess I'll go and make up some URIs for the Bath and Zthes profiles.

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  "MINIX costs $169, but the license allows making two backup
         copies, so the effective price can be under $60" -- Andy
         Tanenbaum.

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/