> >>I told her to ignore it as it's not official CQL, but she probably
> >>understood it. With no other indexes then it's understandable, it's when
> >>you add the new indexes, relation modifiers and such like that it becomes
> >So what about:
> >searchTerm ::= term | '(' searchTerm boolean term ')'
> It's a step forward. But a complicated one in order to achive 33% of the
> goal :)
For me it achieves the goals of maintaining a simple and intuitive
language, while allowing you to have end users type simple 'CQL' into
search boxes which they might do.
,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension 3142
,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
I L L U M I N A T I