> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:31:01 -0500
> From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <[log in to unmask]>
> Can we add a flag where the client says either "must be one of
> these" or "if you can't support any of these select another one".
> (Yes I realize it's just an example but I think this would make it a
> more useful example.)
Fine by me.
BTW., I think this is an excellent document.
> "In the event where, if the server cannot support any schemas in the
> list then the client wishes the server to select an alternative
> schema, it is recommended to omit the recordSchema parameter (thus
> if the server does not support the extension, non-support will be
> transparent). In the event where, if the server cannot support any
> schemas in the list then the client does not want the server to
> select an alternative schema, it is recommended to include
> recordSchema parameter (similarly, if the server does not support
> the extension, non-support will be transparent)."
Well, we'll need to get rid of all those fluffy "recommended to"s, but
/o ) \/ Mike Taylor <[log in to unmask]> http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\ Linguistics professor says, "A double positive never makes
a positive"; student replies, "Yeah, right" -- (unattributed)
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at