> Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 17:31:01 -0500
> From: "Ray Denenberg, Library of Congress" <[log in to unmask]>
>
> in
> http://www.loc.gov/z3950/agency/zing/srw1-1/extra-data-example.html
> Can we add a flag where the client says either "must be one of
> these" or "if you can't support any of these select another one".
>
> (Yes I realize it's just an example but I think this would make it a
> more useful example.)

Fine by me.

BTW., I think this is an excellent document.

> "In the event where, if the server cannot support any schemas in the
> list then the client wishes the server to select an alternative
> schema, it is recommended to omit the recordSchema parameter (thus
> if the server does not support the extension, non-support will be
> transparent). In the event where, if the server cannot support any
> schemas in the list then the client does not want the server to
> select an alternative schema, it is recommended to include
> recordSchema parameter (similarly, if the server does not support
> the extension, non-support will be transparent)."

Well, we'll need to get rid of all those fluffy "recommended to"s, but
otherwise yes.

 _/|_    _______________________________________________________________
/o ) \/  Mike Taylor  <[log in to unmask]>  http://www.miketaylor.org.uk
)_v__/\  Linguistics professor says, "A double positive never makes
         a positive"; student replies, "Yeah, right" -- (unattributed)

--
Listen to my wife's new CD of kids' music, _Child's Play_, at
        http://www.pipedreaming.org.uk/childsplay/