Fine by me also,
>>> [log in to unmask] 2-12-03 13:26:30 >>>
Fine by me.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Sanderson [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:07 AM
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Scan
> A couple of things to do with the scan request:
> 1. Can we renamed 'numberOfTerms' as 'maximumTerms' to be
> more consistent
> with 'maximumRecords' from the search request?
> 2. 'startRecord' and 'maximumRecords' are both optional in the
> request. Can responsePosition and numberOfTerms be
> optional. Like the
> search request, maximum would be server determined (in
> Explain) and
> response would default to 1.
> Just cosmetic changes, but more consistent with the search request.
> ,'/:. Dr Robert Sanderson ([log in to unmask])
> ,'-/::::. http://www.o-r-g.org/~azaroth/
> ,'--/::(@)::. Special Collections and Archives, extension
> ,'---/::::::::::. Nebmedes: http://nebmedes.o-r-g.org:8000/
> I L L U M I N A T I