On Jan 28, 2004, at 10:25 AM, Andrew E Switala wrote:
> Right, that's not schema valid, and I don't know what the semantics
> would be if it were. I mean, what are you trying to express with such
> construct (that wouldn't be better expressed using <relatedItem>)?
I'm embedding it in a document. I've been playing with how to handle
coding a CV in XML, where I want to be able to use MODS metadata for
publications and presentations. This perhaps works better, though, but
is the same idea: