LISTSERV mailing list manager LISTSERV 16.0

Help for ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST Archives

ARSCLIST Archives


ARSCLIST@LISTSERV.LOC.GOV


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST Home

ARSCLIST  February 2004

ARSCLIST February 2004

Subject:

Re: 78 RPM Packing Advice Requested

From:

George Brock-Nannestad <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 19:24:10 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (85 lines)

From: Patent Tactics, George Brock-Nannestad

I have once bought shellac records that I filled directly onto pallets (6 of
them) inside what I would translate as "pallet frames". These constitute
collapsible wooden frames with steel hinges that fit closely to a standard
pallet and which may be stacked for instance 6 frames high (about 4 feet) or
higher. However you only need the height to go a bit above the records. One
so-to-speak creates a big wooden crate having a pallet as the bottom. The
records were in two layers only - one consisting of two tightly filled rows
of 12" along the length of the pallet, and a further layer consisting of
several (this was in 1984, so I forget how many) rows of 10" records across
on top. It should be noted that in Denmark, records not in albums almost
always came in stiff carton covers with a reasonably identical height, making
a reasonable flat top surface when placed in rows.

The bottom was covered in styrofoam sheet, about 1" thick, and the inside
surfaces of the pallet frames were covered in the same, all cut from
insulating sheets from a home-building supply market. All spaces were filled
with strips of the same, and there was a layer between the two layers of
records. There was no lid as such (it was a local transport with a truck
having a hydraulic platform) but tarpaulin for each. The frames were fixed in
the habitual way by means of steel strips (blue plastic these days) tightened
and with a small clamp. All it required was a rain-proof area where the 5
pallets could stand while they were filled, and a tarpaulin to protect them
until the truck came. If you use this solution, there would no need to buy
boxes at all.

> >
> Is there any particular reason that 11" x 11" x 11" would be better than
> 10"x10"x10"?  The 10" inch box would certainly make for a tighter fit.
> Is the concern based on the fact that, with a 10" box, the edge of the
> records would be touching the interior walls on all 4 sides?  The 10"
> boxes are about 20 percent less expensive than the 11" boxes - but since
> my main concern is that the records arrive in good shape, that price
> difference is certainly not my deciding factor.

----- I would say that if any manual moving of the records occurs, it is wise
to pad with 1" styrofoam on every side, increasing the size of the box.
Someone may drop a box. Modern styrofoam does not do any degassing of styrene
to any amount that might attack records during the short period they would be
in contact.

>
> I am going to want to keep the storage albums as I have a feeling that I
> will have an easier time getting some of my money back by selling them
> than I will finding someone who wants the records that don't match my
> listening tastes.

----- when shipping records via mail or as airline luggage I separate records
from albums or sleeves and stack them interleaving with newsprint. 3 inches
of records is handy, and package tape or duct tape is efficient for keeping
the stack together.


> My concern is with the safety of
> records that might be in albums that may have only 1 or 2 out of 10
> sleeves filled.  I have not seen the collection in person,  so I am not
> sure what percentage of such albums there may be.  When I look at empty
> or nearly empty albums, I notice that the ends of the covers come
> together at an angel.

----- right you are, this is a very dangerous situation. But most important
of all: you can only stack records that are flat. If you have dished records
you would need to mate them according to "dishihess".

  Or is it better to alternate the direction of
> the spine on each album?  I have never really trusted albums so I rarely
> use them.

----- I alternate albums, but the ideal way is to alternate while centering
the records inside the albums. Due to lack of space, I have one stack of
albums sitting vertically like this on the floor. Strips of - yes, styrofoam
again - could be put at the non-spine end to keep the distance.

In shipping records back home (Denmark) with our luggage, the only breakage
of one record occurred because Homeland Security re-packed the inspected
baggage in a most inexpert way - they reversed the order of a stiffening
board and a shock-absorbing styrofoam sheet. I have complained to their
website in June, 2003, but I have had no response at all. So, if it were
possible, I would use a truck anytime.

Kind regards, and good luck,

George

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LISTSERV.LOC.GOV

CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager